Ex Parte Schmand et al - Page 2

            Appeal 2007-1868                                                                                  
            Application 10/441,682                                                                            

                                               INVENTION                                                      
                   The invention is directed to a detector array of use in an imaging system,                 
            such as, X-ray, fluoroscopy, etc.  The detector array includes a plurality of                     
            scintillators.  See page 2 of Appellants’ Specification.  Claim 1 is representative of            
            the invention and reproduced below:                                                               
                         1. A detector array comprising:                                                      
                         an MxN array of scintillator elements, said array of scintillator                    
                   elements defining a plurality of outermost scintillator elements;                          
                         an air gap defined between adjacent said scintillator elements; and                  
                         a mechanism for maintaining a relative position of each of said array                
                   of scintillator elements with respect to each of said array of scintillator                
                   elements, said mechanism including at least a retainer received about a                    
                   perimeter of said array of scintillator elements, said retainer spanning at least          
                   a portion of a height of said array of scintillator elements.                              

                                               REFERENCE                                                      
                   The reference relied upon by the Examiner is:                                              
                   Cherry   US 6,552,348 B2  Apr. 22, 2003                                                    

                                          REJECTION AT ISSUE                                                  
                   Claims 1 through 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being                       
            anticipated by Cherry.  The Examiner’s rejection is set forth on pages 3 and 4 of                 
            the Answer.                                                                                       
                   Throughout the opinion we make reference to the Brief (filed March 21,                     
            2006), and the Answer (mailed May 8, 2006) for the respective details thereof.                    


                                                      2                                                       


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013