1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered
2 today is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4
5 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
6 _____________
7
8 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
9 AND INTERFERENCES
10 _____________
11
12 Ex parte TADAHIRO OHMI, HIROSHI MOROKOSHI, MICHIO YAMAJI,
13 SHIGEAKI TANAKA, KEIJI HIRAO, YUJI KAWANO, TAKASHI HIROSE,
14 KOSUKE YOKOYAMA, MICHIO KURAMOCHI, MASAYUKI HATANO,
15 and NOBUKAZU IKEDA
16 _____________
17
18 Appeal No. 2007-1869
19 Application No. 09/023,416
20 Technology Center 3700
21 ______________
22
23 Decided: August 15, 2007
24 _______________
25
25 Before TERRY J. OWENS, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and HUBERT C.
26
26 LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
27
28
28 OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
29
30
31
32 DECISION ON APPEAL
33 The Appellants appeal from a rejection of claim 1, which is the sole claim.
34
35
36
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013