The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte TAKASHI ENOMOTO, IKUO YAMAMOTO,
NORIHITO OTSUKI, TERUYUKI FUKUDA,
and KAYO KUSUMI
______________
Appeal 2007-1888
Application 10/258,067
Technology Center 1700
_______________
Decided: July 25, 2007
_______________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and
CHARLES F. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicants appeal to the Board from the decision of the Primary
Examiner finally rejecting for at least the second time claims 1 and 3
through 22 in the Office action mailed July 1, 2005. 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and
134(a) (2002); 37 C.F.R. § 41.31(a) (2005).
We affirm the decision of the Primary Examiner.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013