The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DONG-SIL NMN PARK,
JAMES ANTHONY RUUD, and
JEFFREY ALLAN PFAENDTNER
____________
Appeal 2007-1900
Application 10/605,858
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: July 31, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and LINDA M.
GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s
decision rejecting claims 1-7, 9-26, and 28-33. We have jurisdiction under
35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013