Ex Parte Uschold - Page 1



                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                              
                                     is not binding precedent of the Board.                                       

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                              ________________                                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                              ________________                                                    
                                    Ex parte RONALD EARL USCHOLD                                                  
                                              ________________                                                    
                                               Appeal 2007-1901                                                   
                                            Application 10/095,922                                                
                                            Technology Center 1700                                                
                                              ________________                                                    
                                           Decided:  August 28, 2007                                              
                                              ________________                                                    
                Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and                                                  
                JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                   
                SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                       This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of                          
                claims 1-3, 5 and 7-9.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6.                                 
                       Claim 1 is illustrative:                                                                   
                              1.  A process for preparing an interpolymer comprising                              
                       polymerizing, in an emulsion polymerization process, vinyl fluoride                        
                       and at least one highly fluorinated monomer in water with a water                          
                       soluble free-radical initiator at a temperature in the range of 60 to                      
                       100ēC. and a pressure in the range of 1 to 12 MPa, said vinyl fluoride                     




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013