Appeal 2007-1901 Application 10/095,922 The Examiner recognized that the present record lacked a showing of criticality for the reactor used. Appellant did not provide evidence to establish the criticality of the reactor. In conclusion, based on the foregoing and the reasons well stated by the Examiner, the Examiner’s decision rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv). AFFIRMED tf/ls E I du Pont de Nemours and Company Legal Patent Records Center Barley Mill Plaza 25/1128 4417 Lancaster Pike Wilmington, DE 19805 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Last modified: September 9, 2013