1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ____________________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ____________________
10
11 Ex parte BERT KLESCZEWSKI,
12 JOERG HOFMANN and PRAMOD GUPTA
13 ____________________
14
15 Appeal 2007-1905
16 Reissue Application 10/931,249
17 Patent 6,444,720 B1
18 Technology Center 1700
19 ____________________
20
21 Decided: June 13, 2007
22 ____________________
23
24 Before: MICHAEL R. FLEMING, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and
25 GARY V. HARKCOM, Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and
26 EWARD C. KIMLIN and BRADLEY R. GARRIS, Administrative Patent
27 Judges, and FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge,
28 and ROMULO H. DELMENDO and SALLY GARDNER LANE,
29 Administrative Patent Judges.
30
31 McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
32
33 DECISION ON APPEAL
34
35 A. Statement of the case
36 This ex parte appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) is from a rejection of
37 claims 1-14, the only claims remaining in the reissue application on appeal.
38 We affirm.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013