The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte FRANCISCO J. NAPOLEZ and TIMOTHY T. DUNCAN
____________
Appeal 2007-1916
Application 10/753,113
Technology Center 3600
____________
Decided: May 18, 2007
____________
Before MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, LINDA E. HORNER, and DAVID B.
WALKER, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALKER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Francisco J. Napolez et al. (“Appellants”) seek our review under 35 U.S.C.
§ 134 of the Examiner’s final rejections of claims 3-9. We have jurisdiction under
35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We reverse.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013