Ex Parte Napolez et al - Page 11



            Appeal 2007-1916                                                                                
            Application 10/753,113                                                                          
            U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Hollis; and claim 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as               
            unpatentable over Hollis.                                                                       
                                                DECISION                                                    
                   Accordingly, the decision of the Examiner to reject claims 3-9 is reversed.              

                                               REVERSED                                                     








            hh                                                                                              
            WILLIAM C. CAHILL                                                                               
            155 PARK ONE                                                                                    
            2141 E. HIGHLAND AVENUE                                                                         
            PHOENIX, AZ  85016                                                                              










                                                    11                                                      



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11

Last modified: September 9, 2013