Appeal 2007-1917
Application 10/222,660
and Sekiguchi, claims 3, 4, and 20 as unpatentable over Boeniger and Terrels, and
claims 7 and 10 as unpatentable over Boeniger, Sekiguchi, and Terrels.
DECISION
The decision of the Examiner to reject claims 1-20 is AFFIRMED-IN-
PART.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this
appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a). See 37 C.F.R.
§ 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
vsh
MCDONNELL, BOEHNEN,
HULBERT & BERGHOFF
300 SOUTH WACKER DRIVE
CHICAGO, IL 60606
24
Page: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Last modified: September 9, 2013