Ex Parte SMITH - Page 1




                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                 
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                         

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  
                                         Ex parte MARY SMITH                                                
                                              ____________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2007-1925                                                
                                          Application 09/391,869                                            
                                          Technology Center 3700                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                                          Decided:  June 25, 2007                                           
                                              ____________                                                  
            Before MICHAEL R. FLEMING, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and                               
            WILLIAM F. PATE, III, JENNIFER D. BAHR,  LINDA E. HORNER, and                                   
            DAVID B. WALKER, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                  
            PER CURIAM                                                                                      


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013