The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not
binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte VALERIE SUE ADAMS,
EMMETT DUDLEY CRAWFORD,
MICHAEL EUGENE DONELSON
and DOUGLAS STEPHENS MCWILLIAMS
____________
Appeal 2007-1945
Application 10/669,215
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: July 31, 2007
____________
Before CHUNG K. PAK, CHARLES F. WARREN, and LINDA M.
GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 26 and 28 through 42, all of
the claims pending in the above-identified application. We have jurisdiction
pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013