Ex Parte Aggarwal et al - Page 1



                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is                        
                                    not binding precedent of the Board.                                      

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                     Ex parte RADHIKA AGGARAWAL, WILLIAM H. KREBS JR.,                                       
                          ELIZABETH A. SCHREIBER and DAVID B. STYLES                                         
                                               ____________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2007-1979                                                 
                                          Application 10/041,141                                             
                                          Technology Center 2100                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                         Decided: August 29, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                  

                Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, JEAN R. HOMERE,                                                  
                and JOHN A. JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
                HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                       


                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                               
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a Final Rejection of                      
                claims 1 to 10.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                                
                      We will sustain the rejection.                                                         







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013