Appeal 2007-1983
Application 09/800,366
unpersuasive argument that the prior art fails to disclose applying two or
more bias pulses substantially sequentially to each microbolometer in an
array in each frame time (Br. 38-39). For the foregoing reasons, the
rejection is therefore sustained.
DECISION
We have sustained the Examiner's rejections with respect to all claims
on appeal. Therefore, the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-27 and 29-
39 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
KIS
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
101 COLUMBIA ROAD
P. O. BOX 2245
MORRISTOWN, NJ 07962-2245
16
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Last modified: September 9, 2013