Ex Parte Kang - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-2021                                                                                  
                Application 09/790,726                                                                            
                                                                                                                 
                                        STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                     
                       Appellant invented an electronic music distribution service that                           
                associates a hyper text markup language (HTML) file with an uploaded                              
                synchronous multimedia integration language (SMIL) file for display as a                          
                web page.  Claim 23 is illustrative:                                                              
                       23.  A multimedia file service method in an electronic music                               
                distribution service system, the multimedia file service method comprising:                       
                       uploading a synchronous multimedia integration language (SMIL) file                        
                to be associated with a corresponding hyper text markup language (HTML)                           
                file; and                                                                                         
                       displaying the HTML file corresponding to the SMIL file and/or other                       
                HTML files.                                                                                       

                       The Examiner relies on the following prior art references to show                          
                unpatentability:                                                                                  
                Lin                         US 6,381,597 B1            Apr. 30, 2002                              
                                                                       (filed Oct. 7, 1999)                       
                Wiser                       US 6,385,596 B1            May 7, 2002                                
                                                                       (filed Feb. 6, 1998)                       
                Balabanovic                 US 6,480,191 B1            Nov. 12, 2002                              
                                                                       (filed Sep. 28, 1999)                      
                Friend                      US 6,728,757 B1            Apr. 27, 2004                              
                                                                       (filed Jun. 4, 1998                        

                    1. Claims 1, 2, 4-8, and 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                        
                       unpatentable over Wiser in view of Lin and further in view of                              
                       Balabanovic.                                                                               
                    2. Claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over                      
                       Wiser in view of Lin, Balabanovic, and further in view of Friend.                          


                                                        2                                                         

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013