The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT SESEK and CHRISTIAN L. STRUBLE
____________
Appeal 2007-2081
Application 09/859,856
Technology Center 3600
____________
Decided: September 26, 2007
____________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, ANITA PELLMAN GROSS,
and JOHN A. JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Sesek and Struble (Appellants) appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner's Final Rejection of claims 1 through 9 and 11 through 34, which
are all of the claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction under
35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013