Ex Parte Sesek et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-2081                                                                                  
                Application 09/859,856                                                                            

                       Appellants' invention relates to a method for configuring devices on a                     
                computer network.  See generally Specification, paragraph [0001].  Claim 1                        
                is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:                                
                       1.  A method for configuring devices on a computer network,                                
                comprising:                                                                                       
                       initiating a configuration session for a primary device;                                   
                       the primary device collecting configuration logic for the primary                          
                device and one or more secondary devices, the configuration logic for each                        
                device including information for generating a user interface for configuring                      
                that device;                                                                                      
                       generating, according to the collected configuration logic, a user                         
                interface having user accessible controls for selecting and returning                             
                configuration settings for the primary and secondary devices; and                                 
                       returning each selected configuration setting to be applied to the                         
                primary or secondary device for which it was selected.                                            
                       The prior art reference of record relied upon by the Examiner in                           
                rejecting the appealed claims is:                                                                 
                Adolfsson US 6,092,078 Jul. 18, 2000                                                              
                       Claims 1, 7, 12, and 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                       
                paragraph, as being indefinite.                                                                   
                       Claims 1 through 9 and 11 through 34 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                        
                § 102(e) as being anticipated by Adolfsson.                                                       
                       We refer to the Examiner's Answer (mailed September 26, 2006) and                          
                to Appellants' Brief (filed June 7, 2006) for the respective arguments.                           




                                                        2                                                         

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013