The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOSE WALTER
____________
Appeal 2007-2082
Application 10/795,457
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: June 29, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN. BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and
THOMAS A. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 3, 5, 6, and 13 (Br. 1).
Claims 7, 9-12, and 15 are the only other claims pending in this application,
but Appellant has not appealed from the Examiner’s rejection of these
claims (Br. 1-2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013