Ex Parte Walter - Page 2

                    Appeal 2007-2082                                                                                                        
                    Application 10/795,457                                                                                                  
                            According to Appellant, the invention is directed to a method of                                                
                    producing a customized molding material by adding to dry gypsum-                                                        
                    containing molding material an aqueous solution of polytetrafluoroethylene                                              
                    (PTFE) (Br. 2).  Independent claim 1 is representative of the invention and is                                          
                    reproduced below:                                                                                                       
                            1.  A method of producing, without a polymerization step such as                                                
                            heating, a customized hardening molding materials comprising the                                                
                            steps of:                                                                                                       
                                     (a) preparing an aqueous moistening solution containing from                                           
                            0.001 to 35% polytetrafluoroethylene, and                                                                       
                                     (b) then moistening dried gypsum containing molding material                                           
                            with the solution prepared in step a.                                                                           
                            The Examiner has relied upon the following prior art references as                                              
                    evidence of unpatentability:                                                                                            
                    Morrell                                   US 3,620,778                               Nov. 16, 1971                      
                    Wada                                      US 5,154,771                               Oct. 13, 1992                      
                    Horiuchi                                 US 5,718,749                               Feb. 17, 1998                       
                    Hoshino                                  JP 53-149224                               Dec. 26, 1978                       
                    (as translated)                                                                                                         
                                                       ISSUES ON APPEAL                                                                     
                            Claims 1, 3, 5, 6, and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                                          
                    paragraph, as failing to set forth the subject matter which Appellant regards                                           
                    as his invention (Answer 4).                                                                                            







                                                                     2                                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013