The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte LEONARD R. SOKOLA, SR.
______________
Appeal 2007-2096
Application 10/611,765
Technology Center 3700
_______________
Decided: September 11, 2007
_______________
Before CHUNG K. PAK, CHARLES F. WARREN, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicant appeals to the Board from the decision of the Primary
Examiner rejecting for at least the second time claims 1 through 5, 7, 10
through 13, and 16 through 20 in the Office Action mailed April 20, 2006.
35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a) (2002); 37 C.F.R. § 41.31(a) (2006).
We affirm-in-part the decision of the Primary Examiner.
Claims 1 and 18 illustrate Appellant’s invention of a dinnerware
article, and are representative of the claims on appeal:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013