The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte ALAN CISAR and TODD ADAMS __________ Appeal 2007-2124 Application 10/175,515 Technology Center 1600 __________ Decided: July 31, 2007 __________ Before DEMETRA J. MILLS, LORA M. GREEN, and RICHARD M. LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges. LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 8-13, 19, 26-28, 36-38, and 47-52. We have jurisdiction 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We reverse. STATEMENT OF CASE The claims are directed to a rhenium-188 (Re-188) generator. Re-188 is “an excellent isotope for radiotherapeutic applications” (Specification 2). “However, [Re-188] has a half-life of only 16.9 hours which is too short for the isotope to be conveniently shipped, and thus means that it must be generated at the site of use” (Specification 2). The prior art discloses severalPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013