Ex Parte 5694604 et al - Page 16


                Appeal 2007-2127                                                                                  
                Reexamination Control No. 90/006,621                                                              
                designate it a continuation of the 1982 and 1985 applications) which:                             
                (1) omitted the computer program appendix; and (2) added that the code                            
                processed by the program can be a natural language, such as English, or the                       
                numbers and strings of a spreadsheet or database, and that lexical analysis                       
                may be used to determine correct spelling and syntactic analysis may be                           
                used to determine correct grammar of a natural language code.                                     
                       The IBM and Microsoft Corporations jointly developed a new                                 
                operating system called Operating System/2 (OS/2), which was announced                            
                in 1987 and extensively written about beginning in 1988.  OS/2 was the first                      
                major operating system with support for "threads" and "multithreading."                           
                       Patent Owner decided that the terms "threads" and "multithreading"                         
                were coined or became common in the art after the filing of his 1982                              
                application and described his invention.  Patent Owner began amending his                         
                1990 application after it was filed to disclose and claim "threads" and                           
                "multithreading."  Patent Owner stated during prosecution that these terms                        
                had their ordinary and customary meanings in the art, that he did not intend                      
                "multithreading" to have a definition which is distinct from the ordinary                         
                generally understood meaning to those skilled in the art, and referred to                         
                dictionaries and books as evidence of the well-defined meanings in the art.                       
                The examiner did not object to the amendments to the specification under                          
                35 U.S.C. § 132 as new matter, or reject the claims based on lack of written                      
                description under § 112, first paragraph.  The examiner accorded the 1990                         
                application the benefit of the 1982 filing date because he did not reject the                     
                claims over OS/2, although several OS/2 references were cited by the Patent                       
                Owner.  The application issued as the '603 patent in 1997.                                        


                                                       16                                                         

Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013