Ex Parte Shah et al - Page 10

                 Appeal 2007-2133                                                                                        
                 Application 10/790,502                                                                                  

                 compositions, a as evinced by McGinniss (McGinniss, e.g., 845-47, 854 and                               
                 Tables 8 and 9).                                                                                        
                        Thus, on this record, we interpret the phrases “cross-link in response                           
                 to infrared radiation” and “infrared radiation to initiate polymerization or                            
                 cross-linking” to encompass the use of infrared radiation to thermally cure                             
                 the epoxy resin precursor compositions.  Our interpretation comports with                               
                 the requirement of claim 27 to expose the epoxy nitrile resin to infrared                               
                 radiation for less than 45 minutes, which time period exceeds that taught in                            
                 the Specification for high energy radiation curing.                                                     
                        We further point out the term “generally ambient temperatures” is not                            
                 disclosed in the Specification with respect to thermal curing, and the passage                          
                 in the Specification referred to by Appellants with respect to this term does                           
                 not describe any embodiment of a epoxy nitrile resin coating precursor                                  
                 compositions (Specification 6:20-22 and 26-31, and 7:1-7; Br. 4; see above                              
                 pp. 8-9).2  To the extent Appellants intend the phrases “cross-link in                                  
                 response to infrared radiation” and “infrared radiation to initiate                                     
                 polymerization or cross-linking,” and thus, the claim, to be limited to high                            
                 energy radiation curing by using the term “generally ambient temperatures”                              
                                                                                                                        
                 2  To the extent that the term “infrared radiation” used in the claim involves                          
                 high energy radiation as Appellants intends (Br., e.g., 8), the Examiner                                
                 should consider whether such an embodiment is described in the written                                  
                 description of the Specification as required by 35 U.S.C. § 112, first                                  
                 paragraph, written description requirement, upon any further prosecution of                             
                 the appealed claims subsequent to the disposition of this appeal.  See In re                            
                 Alton, 76 F.3d 1168, 1172, 1175-176, 37 USPQ2d 1578, 1583 (Fed. Cir.                                    
                 1996) (a prima facie case is established by a showing that a claim                                      
                 encompasses “embodiments of the invention that are completely outside the                               
                 scope of the specification”).                                                                           
                                                           10                                                            

Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013