The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte JAMES F. PITZEN
________________
Appeal 2007-2153
Application 10/304,730
Technology Center 1700
________________
Decided: June 11, 2007
________________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and
THOMAS A. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-7 and 9.
Claim 1 is illustrative:
1. A laminate for use in decorating a receptor surface such as the
surface of a window, said laminate comprising:
an elongate strip of decorative sheet material having opposite
front and rear surfaces extending between a first longitudinally extending
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013