Appeal 2007-2153
Application 10/304,730
of Martinez are in contact. This follows from Martinez apparently adhering
the background substrate before positioning the appliqués.
The “secondary” references are not cited by the Examiner to remedy
the deficiencies of Martinez discussed above and, in fact, do not do so.
In conclusion, based on the foregoing, we are constrained to reverse
the Examiner’s rejections.
REVERSED
clj
3M Innovative Properties Company
P.O. Box 33427
St. Paul, MN 55133-3427
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Last modified: September 9, 2013