Ex Parte Borg - Page 2

                 Appeal 2007-2167                                                                                        
                 Application 09/991,752                                                                                  

                        Appellant has invented a method for automating portions of a data                                
                 entry process as a user enters the user information (Specification 3).                                  
                 According to Appellant, by storing user information in a storage medium                                 
                 and accessing the entered information, the identity of a user is determined                             
                 and additional information pertaining to the user is retrieved from the                                 
                 storage medium (id.).                                                                                   
                        Claim 1, which is representative of the claims on appeal, reads as                               
                 follows:                                                                                                
                                1.  An automated data entry method comprising:                                           
                                entering a user information at a first location;                                         
                                searching a storage medium at said first location to determine                           
                        an identity of a user based on the entered information;                                          
                                accessing a storage medium at a second location upon not being                           
                        able to identify a user by searching the storage medium at said first                            
                        location, said medium at the second location containing information                              
                        for a plurality of users;                                                                        
                                searching the storage medium at the second location to                                   
                        determine an identity of said user based on the entered information;                             
                        and                                                                                              
                                retrieving additional information pertaining to the user from the                        
                        storage medium at the first or second locations based on the                                     
                        determined identity.                                                                             
                        The prior art relied upon by the Examiner in rejecting the claims on                             
                 appeal is:                                                                                              
                 Gupta    US 5,826,258   Oct. 20, 1998                                                                   
                 Gupta    US 6,199,079 B1   Mar.  6,  2001                                                               



                                                           2                                                             

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013