The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL D. WOOD,
MARK L. LAFOREST, NEIL MURDIE,
DEAN S. KRISKOVICH, VERNON R. HUDALLA
AND THADDEUS W. GONSOWSKI
____________
Appeal 2007-2175
Application 10/315,464
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: August 14, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and CATHERINE Q.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This decision is in response to Appellants’ appeal under 35 U.S.C.
§ 134(a). This appeal involves claims 1, 2, and 4-16, the claims maintained
under rejection by the Examiner in the Answer (Answer 6).1 Claim 37 has
1 References to the Answer are to the edited Answer mailed January 3, 2007.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013