Appeal 2007-2184 Application 10/322,838 III. CONCLUSION We conclude that Examiner has not established that each and every limitation of the claims is described or suggested by the prior art or would have been obvious based on the knowledge of those of ordinary skill in the art. IV. DECISION The decision of the Examiner is reversed. REVERSED cam Zarley Law Firm, PLC Capital Square 400 Locust, Suite 200 Des Moines, IA 50309-2350 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Last modified: September 9, 2013