The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOSEPH YUDOVSKY, LAWRENCE C. LEI,
SALVADOR UMOTOY, TOM MADAR, GIRISH DIXIT,
and GWO-CHUAN TZU
____________
Appeal 2007-2185
Application 10/614,992
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: August 21, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and
CHARLES F. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of
claims 3-6, 8-14, and 17-25. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant
to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We AFFIRM.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013