The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LARRY RISING
____________
Appeal 2007-2201
Application 10/613,735
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 25, 2007
____________
Before CHARLES F. WARREN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 26 through 48. Claims 1-23
and 49-74 are the only other claims pending in this application and stand
withdrawn from consideration as directed to a non-elected invention (Br.
2).1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
1 We refer to and cite from the amended Appeal Brief dated Nov. 6, 2006.1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013