Appeal 2007-2201
Application 10/613,735
As also discussed above, Appellant fails to present any specific,
substantive arguments for the patentability of any claim other than claim 26.
Therefore, with regard to the rejections based on § 103(a), we adopt the
Examiner’s findings and conclusions of law (Answer 7-11). We affirm each
of the rejections based on § 103(a).
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
cam
CARY TOPE-MCKAY
TOPE-MCKAY & ASSOCIATES
23852 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY #311
MALIBU, CA 90265
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: September 9, 2013