Ex Parte Wood et al - Page 1



                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                   
                                       is not binding precedent of the Board.                                            

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                                    ____________                                                         
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                    ____________                                                         
                   Ex parte RAY W. WOOD, LAN DeCASTRO, and H. WILLIAM BOSCH                                              
                                                    ____________                                                         
                                                  Appeal 2007-2212                                                       
                                               Application 10/667,472                                                    
                                              Technology Center 1600                                                     
                                                    ____________                                                         
                                            Decided: September 20, 2007                                                  
                                                    ____________                                                         
                 Before DEMETRA J. MILLS, LORA M. GREEN, and NANCY J. LINCK,                                             
                 Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                           
                 MILLS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     

                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                         
                        This appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involves claims 10-22 and 24-26.1                              
                 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).  We affirm.                                                




                                                                                                                        
                 1 Claims 23 and 27-74 are also pending, but stand withdrawn from                                        
                 consideration (Br. 3).                                                                                  



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013