Appeal 2007-2212 Application 10/667,472 surface, such particles are stable and have a high bioavailability. Thus the function of the surface modifier of Liversidge is to yield higher bioavailability of the nanoparticle. (Liveridge, col. 3, ll. 1-23.) One of ordinary skill in the art would thus also expect Appellants’ nanoparticles treated with a surface modifier to provide for a higher bioavailability. Such expected beneficial results are evidence of obviousness just as unexpected beneficial results are evidence of unobviousness. See In re Skoner, 517 F.2d 947, 950, 186 USPQ 80, 82 (CCPA 1975). In the present case, one of ordinary skill in the art would have expected surface-modified nanoparticles to provide greater bioavailability of beclamethasone diproprionate in view of the disclosures of Liversidge and Drug. The obviousness rejection is affirmed. CONCLUSION The obviousness rejections are affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED lbg ELAN DRUG DELIVERY, INC. C/O FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 3000 K STREET, N.W. SUITE 500 WASHINGTON DC 20007-5109 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: September 9, 2013