1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ____________________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ____________________
10
11 Ex parte MARTIN W. RUPICH and THOMAS A. KODENKANDATH
12 ____________________
13
14 Appeal 2007-2236
15 Application 10/991,738
16 Technology Center 1700
17 ____________________
18
19 Decided: June 29, 2007
20 ____________________
21
22 Before FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge,
23 and ROMULO H. DELMENDO and MICHAEL P. TIERNEY,
24 Administrative Patent Judges.
25
26 McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
27
28 DECISION ON APPEAL
29
30 A. Statement of the case
31 Appellants Martin W. Rupich and Thomas A. Kodenkandath
32 (hereafter "Rupich") seek review under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) of a rejection of
33 claims 89-96, the only claims remaining in the application on appeal.
34 The reader should know that no references to et al. are made in this
35 opinion.
36 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013