Appeal 2007-2236 Application 10/991,738 1 The application on appeal was filed on 18 November 2004. 2 The application was published on 09 March 2006 as Publication 3 2006/0051600 A1. 4 Rupich claims benefit of an earlier filing date based on (1) application 5 10/673,307, filed 29 September 2003, which is said to be (2) a division of 6 application 09/855,312, filed 14 May 2001, which is said to be (3) a 7 continuation-in-part of application 09/694,400 filed 23 October 2000. 8 The real party in interest is American Superconductor Corporation. 9 Supp. Appeal Brief 1. 10 The Examiner rejected claims 89-91 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as 11 being unpatentable over Gupta and Mizuta. 12 The Examiner has also rejected claims 92-96 as being unpatentable 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over Gupta, Mizuta and Kobayashi. 14 The following prior art was relied upon by the Examiner. 15 16 Name Patent Number Publication Date 17 Kobayashi US 5,304,533 19 Apr. 1994 18 Mizuta EP 0 277 202 B1 19 Apr. 1995 19 20 Gupta, Superconducting oxide films with high transition temperature 21 prepared from metal trifluoroacetate precursors, 52 Applied Physics Letters 22 2077-2079 (1988). 23 24 Kobayashi, Mizuta and Gupta are prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). 25 26 B. Record on appeal 27 In deciding this appeal, we have considered only the following 28 documents: 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013