Appeal 2007-2343
Application 09/928,856
plurality of messages being preconfigured to be sent to a recipient,
wherein at least one of the messages is a text message that includes at
least one token, wherein the messaging module receives the plurality
of preconfigured messages from the message web site based on a user
identification and displays the message user interface on the display
thereby enabling the user to select the message from the plurality of
preconfigured messages, and wherein the messaging module allows
the user to enter token text to replace the at least one token in the
message;
providing to the user a recipient user interface to select the
recipient; and
sending the message to the recipient through the global
computer network.
The prior art relied upon by the Examiner in rejecting the claims on
appeal is:
Martin US 2002/0174106 A1 Nov. 21, 2002
Graham US 2002/0178353 A1 Nov. 28, 2002
Puskala US 6,908,389 B1 Jun. 21, 2005
The rejections as presented by the Examiner are as follows:
1. Claims 1-3, 7, 8, 13-19, 23, 24, 29-34, and 37 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Puskala and Martin.
2. Claims 9-12, 25-28, and 38-40 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Puskala, Martin, and Graham.
ISSUES
(1) Under 35 U.S.C § 103(a), with respect to appealed claims 1-3, 7,
8, 13-19, 23, 24, 29-34, and 37, would one of ordinary skill in the
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013