Ex Parte Kammer - Page 1







                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               __________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                               __________                                                   
                                       Ex parte DAVID KAMMER                                                
                                               __________                                                   
                                            Appeal 2007-2355                                                
                                          Application 10/006,952                                            
                                         Technology Center 2600                                             
                                               __________                                                   
                                        Decided: October 30, 2007                                           
                                                _________                                                   
               Before JOSEPH L. DIXON, ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, and                                             
               ST. JOHN COURTENAY III, Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
               COURTENAY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                      


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the                        
               Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-6 and 8-31.  Claim 7 has been cancelled.                    
               We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).  We AFFIRM.                                     







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013