The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not
binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DURA LINE CORPORATION
____________
Appeal 2007-2358
Reexamination Control 90/006,8881
Patent 4,892,4422
Technology Center 3600
____________
Decided: September 17, 2007
____________
Before TEDDY S. GRON, CAROL A. SPIEGEL, and MARK NAGUMO,
Administrative Patent Judges.
NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
A. Introduction
The Patent Owner, Dura Line Corporation ("Dura Line"), appeals
from the final rejection of claims 1–6, 9, and 10 in the reexamination of U.S.
1 Reexamination requested by third party requester Michael L. Kenaga.
2 Issued to John Shoffner on 9 January 1990, based on original application
07/021,237, filed 3 May 1987.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013