Ex Parte Reinert - Page 1

                              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                         
                                       is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                        Ex parte GARY L. REINERT                                                 
                                              Appeal 2007-2399                                                   
                                            Application 10/896,417                                               
                                           Technology Center 2800                                                
                                            Decided: July 17, 2007                                               
                Before TONI R. SCHEINER, LORA M. GREEN, and RICHARD M.                                           
                LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                          
                LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           
                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                       This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 21- 26.                   
                We have jurisdiction of this appeal under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).  We affirm.                          

                                           STATEMENT OF CASE                                                     
                       The claims are drawn to a stainless steel alignment assembly                              
                apparatus for airport inset lights.  Claims 21-26, all the pending claims, are                   
                rejected over prior art.  The Examiner relies on the following evidence of                       

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013