Ex Parte Reinert - Page 1



                              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                         
                                       is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                  __________                                                     
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                  __________                                                     
                                        Ex parte GARY L. REINERT                                                 
                                                  __________                                                     
                                              Appeal 2007-2399                                                   
                                            Application 10/896,417                                               
                                           Technology Center 2800                                                
                                                  __________                                                     
                                            Decided: July 17, 2007                                               
                                                  __________                                                     
                Before TONI R. SCHEINER, LORA M. GREEN, and RICHARD M.                                           
                LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                          
                LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           
                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                       This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 21- 26.                   
                We have jurisdiction of this appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).  We affirm.                          

                                           STATEMENT OF CASE                                                     
                       The claims are drawn to a stainless steel alignment assembly                              
                apparatus for airport inset lights.  Claims 21-26, all the pending claims, are                   
                rejected over prior art.  The Examiner relies on the following evidence of                       
                unpatentability:                                                                                 





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013