The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HEINZ LUFT
____________
Appeal 2007-2439
Application 10/089,668
Technology Center 3700
____________
Decided: July 25, 2007
____________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellant appeals the final rejection of claims 26-29 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 134. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We AFFIRM.
INTRODUCTION
Appellant claims a fuel injector for injecting fuel in an internal
combustion engine (claim 26). The fuel injector has an adjusting body (40)
placed in direct contact with a sleeve (24) so that a fuel amount flowing per
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013