The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte HEINZ LUFT ____________ Appeal 2007-2439 Application 10/089,668 Technology Center 3700 ____________ Decided: July 25, 2007 ____________ Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellant appeals the final rejection of claims 26-29 under 35 U.S.C. � 134. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. � 6(b). We AFFIRM. INTRODUCTION Appellant claims a fuel injector for injecting fuel in an internal combustion engine (claim 26). The fuel injector has an adjusting body (40) placed in direct contact with a sleeve (24) so that a fuel amount flowing perPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013