Appeal 2007-2446
Application 09/817,998
Srinivasan US 6,072,862 Jun. 6, 2000
Gordon US 6,289,323, B1 Sep. 11, 2001
(filed Jun. 18, 1999)
Busch US 6,390,921 B1 May 21, 2002
(filed Feb. 7, 2000)
Kuebert US 2002/0165729 A1 Nov. 7, 2002
(filed Oct. 15, 2001)
Sherwood US 6,542,584 B1 Apr. 1, 2003
REJECTIONS AT ISSUE
Claims 1 through 11, 15 through 16, 19 through 21, and 23 through 25
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (a) as being unpatentable over Kuebert
in view of Lynt and Srinivasan. The Examiner’s rejection is set forth on
pages 3 through 6 of the Answer.
Claim 12 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (a) as being
unpatentable over Kuebert in view of Lynt, Srinivasan, and Sherwood. The
Examiner’s rejection is set forth on page 6 of the Answer.
Claim 17 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (a) as being
unpatentable over Kuebert in view of Lynt, Srinivasan, and McKeen. The
Examiner’s rejection is set forth on pages 6 and 7 of the Answer.
Claim 18 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (a) as being
unpatentable over Kuebert in view of Lynt, Srinivasan, and Gordon. The
Examiner’s rejection is set forth on page 7 of the Answer.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013