The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DOUGLAS E. JEWETT, ADAM J. RADFORD,
BRADLEY D. STRAND, JEFFREY D. CHUNG,
JOEL D. JACOBSON, ROBERT B. HAIGLER,
ROD S. THOMPSON, and THOMAS L. COUCH
____________
Appeal 2007-2449
Application 09/927,894
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: October 26, 2007
____________
Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, ANITA PELLMAN GROSS,
and MARC S. HOFF, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's
Rejection of claims 1 through 37 and 54 through 59, which are all of the
claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
§ 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013