Ex Parte Jewett et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-2449                                                                              
                Application 09/927,894                                                                        

                      Appellants' invention relates block-level access to storage resources                   
                over a computer network without a central file manager.  (See generally                       
                Specification 2:6-9.)  Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it               
                reads as follows:                                                                             
                1.    A block-level shared network storage system, comprising:                                
                      a storage server comprising an array of disk drives, and comprising a                   
                processor that runs a device driver to provide block-level access to data                     
                stored on the array of disk drives; and                                                       
                      a host computer coupled to the storage server by at least one computer                  
                network;                                                                                      
                      wherein the host computer and the storage server perform input/output                   
                (I/O) operations over the at least one network using multiple, concurrent                     
                logical connections, each logical connection being between the host                           
                computer and the storage server over the at least one computer network,                       
                such that a first I/O operation is executed over a first logical connection                   
                while a second I/O operation is executed over a second logical connection.                    
                      The prior art reference of record relied upon by the Examiner in                        
                rejecting the appealed claims is:                                                             
                Wang                    US 6,834,326 B1         Dec. 21, 2004                                 
                      Claims 1 through 37 and 54 through 59 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                    
                § 102(e) as being anticipated by Wang.                                                        
                      We refer to the Examiner's Answer (mailed January 3, 2007) and to                       
                Appellants' Brief (filed October 5, 2006) and Reply Brief (filed January 12,                  
                2007) for the respective arguments.                                                           





                                                      2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013