Appeal 2007-2496 Application 10/096,299 jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). Claims 61, 70, and 71 are representative of the claims on appeal, and read as follows: 61. A method of increasing the cardiac performance of a diseased heart, comprising: providing a surgical access to a ventricular chamber of the diseased heart; providing a preshaped expandable member preshaped to alter an existing geometry of the ventricular chamber of the diseased heart, and having a shape which, when installed and inflated in the ventricular chamber, together with the ventricular chamber more closely approximates the ventricular geometry of a healthy heart compared to the ventricular chamber prior to installing and inflating said preshaped expandable member therein; inserting said preshaped expandable member through said surgical access and into said ventricular chamber; and inflating said preshaped expandable member to said shape which, together with the ventricular chamber more closely approximates the ventricular geometry of a healthy heart. 70. The method of claim 61, further comprising visually confirming an appropriate degree of expansion of the expandable member effected by said inflating the expandable member. 71. The method of claim 61, further comprising preventing contraction or further expansion of the expandable member after said inflating the expandable member to said shape. The Examiner relies on the following reference: Daskalakis US 5,192,314 Mar. 9, 1993 We affirm-in-part. DISCUSSION Claims 61, 62, 70, and 71 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Deskalakis. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013