The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JEFFREY N. EISEN
____________
Appeal 2007-2514
Application 10/034,255
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: September 21, 2007
____________
Before JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, and ST. JOHN
COURTENAY, III, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Eisen (Appellant) appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's
Final Rejection of claims 1 through 25, which are all of the claims pending
in this application. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Appellant's invention relates to a method for enabling a user to select
documents from a summary view of documents and to create a list of the
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013