Appeal 2007-2514
Application 10/034,255
In addition, the Examiner (Answer 5) relies upon Outlook 97 for a
suggestion of using a hyperlink to a current version of a document
associated with the hyperlink. However, Outlook 97 merely shows opening
an email message in another window. We find no suggestion to include a
hyperlink with each entry of a reusable list to link to the current version of
the document associated with the hyperlink. Thus, the Examiner has not
established a prima facie case of obviousness for each of independent claims
1, 8, 15, 23, and 24, nor for their dependents, claims 2 through 7, 9 through
14, 16 through 22, and 25. Consequently, we cannot sustain the obviousness
rejection of claims 1 through 25.
ORDER
The decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1 through 25 under
35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, and under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013