The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte IAN FAYE, FRANK BRENNER,
THANH-HUNG NGUYEN-SCHAEFER,
RAINER SALIGER, and THOMAS HEBNER
____________
Appeal 2007-2553
Application 10/367,347
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: July 31, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-3 and 15. Claims 4-14 and
16 are the only other claims pending in this application and stand objected to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013