The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JACQUES GULBENKIAN
__________
Appeal 2007-2596
Application 10/370,634
Technology Center 3600
__________
Decided: September 13, 2007
__________
Before ERIC GRIMES, LORA M. GREEN, and RICHARD M.
LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to a
post-tensioning system for concrete structures. The Examiner has rejected
the claims as anticipated and obvious. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
§ 6(b). We reverse the anticipation rejection, vacate the appealed
obviousness rejections, and enter new obviousness rejections under 37
C.F.R. § 41.50(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013