The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte MARTIN C. BAKER, FEDERICO RENTERIA, THOMAS M. HUGHES, and CLYDE R, TAYLOR ______________ Appeal 2007-2618 Application 10/713,178 Technology Center 1700 _______________ Decided: September 26, 2007 _______________ Before CHUNG K. PAK, CHARLES F. WARREN, and THOMAS A. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Applicants appeal to the Board from the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims 1 through 17 and 19 through 26 in the Office Action mailed February 7, 2006 (Office Action). 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a) (2002); 37 C.F.R. § 41.31(a) (2005). We affirm the decision of the Primary Examiner.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013