The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JAMES T.C. YUAN, JOHN S. NOVAK, EDWARD F. STEINER and VIJAY K. JUNEJA ____________ Appeal 2007-2673 Application 10/354,981 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: September 26, 2007 ____________ Before THOMAS A. WALTZ, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 3 through 14, and 18 through 28, all of the claims pending in the above-identified application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013