Ex Parte Yuan et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                   
                Ex parte JAMES T.C. YUAN, JOHN S. NOVAK, EDWARD F. STEINER                                    
                                           and VIJAY K. JUNEJA                                                
                                               ____________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-2673                                                 
                                           Application 10/354,981                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                                        Decided: September 26, 2007                                           
                                               ____________                                                   
                Before THOMAS A. WALTZ, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and LINDA M.                                        
                GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                       
                SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                          
                Examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 3 through 14, and 18 through 28, all                  
                of the claims pending in the above-identified application.  We have                           
                jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.                                                       







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013